[16:40]<WesMac> Does anybody besides RequireJS implements Transports/D? How about Async/A? kriszyp, are they in Dojo? [16:51]<kriszyp> Yabble implements transport/D [16:52]<kriszyp> and Async/A [16:52]<kriszyp> neither transport/D nor Async/A is in Dojo [16:53]<WesMac> kriszyp: Thanks. Does Transporter use them? [16:54]<dmachi> Transporter itself can use requirejs or yabble iirc [16:54]<kriszyp> transporter is using AMD [16:55]<WesMac> Ah, and AMD is significantly different from Transports/D [16:55]* WesMac is having a hard time keeping the landscape straight [16:55]<kriszyp> yeah [16:55]<kriszyp> and Dojo is using AMD [16:56]<WesMac> Got it. RequireJS, now, is roughly Transports/D + AMD? [16:56]<WesMac> Or at least, it implemented Transports/D at one point? [16:56]<WesMac> (anybody know if Narwhal ever implemented Loaders/* ? ) [16:56]<WesMac> (or anybody else?) [16:57]<kriszyp> RequireJS doesn't support Transport/D in the core, it has a plugin for transport/D [16:58]<WesMac> Okay, that's good. I'm trying to figure out which specs have been successfully implemented and where so I can document, you know, 'prior art' accurately [16:58]<kriszyp> I don't think Narwhal doesn't anything with this [16:58]<WesMac> Hm, I kind of thought he had plug-in loaders (sync) but I can't seem to find formal reference to that [16:58]<kriszyp> Nodules also implements AMD, fwiw [16:58]<WesMac> Thanks! [20:04]<WesMac> Hmm, MS-Word suggests that "resolve, normalize, or canonanicalize the paths provided" should be changed to *canabalize* the paths provided [20:05]<deanlandolt1> what, those aren't the same thing? [20:06]<deanlandolt1> common misconception [20:07]<deanlandolt1> http://www.bash.org/?5300 [20:11]<WesMac> lol [20:11]<WesMac> deanlandolt1: Interesting, right in Modules/1.1.1 require.main is an object [20:11]<WesMac> deanlandolt1: What implementations have you verified that it's a module id? [20:12]<deanlandolt1> i think it's a module id on ringo [20:12]<deanlandolt1> but it's a module object everywhere else that i've tried [20:12]<deanlandolt1> 1.1 even specifies that [20:12]<WesMac> wait, what did GPSEE implement? module object? [20:13]<WesMac> (geez, from talking to me, you'd think I was a stoner) [20:13]<WesMac> Yeah, it must have been the module object [20:14]<deanlandolt1> it was the module object [20:14]<deanlandolt1> it was correct IIRC