[9:22]<Dantman> We're back in the "we've talked a lot about binary, and come up with more specs, but we still haven't actually come up with anything we agree on and can finally be used." state aren't we? [9:23]<kriskowal> Dantman, yes [9:23]<kriskowal> but i think there are three prototypes of binary/b [9:24]<kriskowal> not that that means anything with regard to what we need to do next [9:25]<kriskowal> Dantman^ [9:25]<kriskowal> also, we need to coordinate on wiki macros [9:26]<Dantman> Mkay [9:29]<kriskowal> Dantman http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/Unit_Testing/1.0 contains an approval list, implementation list, and unit test list. maybe you could put that all in a macro to demonstrate the pattern? [9:29]<Dantman> Binary wise... I'm thinking of seeing how many implementers in the group would go for a stance of supporting multiple binary systems. [9:30]<kriskowal> i'm not keen on the idea personally [9:33]<Dantman> WebGL already has it's own binary type doesn't it? [9:42]* Dantman gets yanked into a self-debate over the idea of gist integration into MediaWiki. [9:45]<Dantman> Oh crap... T_T The music is enticing me to code it... [10:14]<Dantman> Heh, this could be fun... besides the getting MediaWiki to update the repo issue [10:15]<Dantman> <git repo="git://gist.github.com/303249.git" ref=master file=isodate.js />, shorthand <git gist=303249 file=isodate.js /> [10:16]<Dantman> Hmm, wait... parserfunction+geshi+#tag... Mmmm... [10:16]<Dantman> *twitch* Though I'm going to have to program in php... T_T [10:20]<Dantman> kriskowal, is it worth it? Being able to display files from git repos and gists on the wiki in highlighted code blocks? [10:27]<Dantman> 2AM... Time to convince myself not to do anything code related and just build models.